Personal learning environments (PLE) in university students of pedagogy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.17.1.25

Keywords:

Education technology, teacher training, initial training, education, PLE

Abstract

The study of personal learning environments (PLE) has great relevance because they are a reflection of the learning strategies that students use with technology, in addition, they are seen as a valuable methodological tool for teaching work. The present investigation of type "expost-facto" and descriptive, analyzes graphical representations of the PLE of 415 students who study the subject "Competencies Tic for the academic life", the first semester of 2016 in the University of Playa Ancha. A detailed description of the tools used by the students is made and the Marascuilo nonparametric test is applied to find differences between faculties. The results show a large list of applications used by students in different devices, however, the study shows that only some are used in a massive way and that students are more consumers than information producers. The comparison between the faculties involved shows differences of use in some general applications and other specific applications. The results show that the PLE study allows to project future academic actions and shows the need to carry out other similar investigations but that consider a classification of applications that reflects the six categories of Bloom for the digital era (remember, understand, apply, analyze , evaluate and create) .

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adell, J. (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje. En J. Aguaded y J. Cabero (Eds.), Tecnologías y medios para la educación en la e-sociedad (pp. 271–288). Madrid: Alianza.

Anderson, L. W. y Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Recuperado a partir de https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Attwell, G. (2007, jan). Personal Learning Environments - the future of eLearning ? eLearning Papers 2,1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

Banks, M. (2010). Los datos visuales en investigación cualitativa. Recuperado a partir de http://site.ebrary.com/lib/interpuertoricosp/Doc?id=10832097

Banks, M. (2010). Los datos visuales en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.

Becerra, M. T. y Gutiérrez, P. (2016). Necesidades formativas del alumnado universitario a partir del análisis de sus Entornos Personales de Aprendizaje. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, (1). https://doi.org/10.6018/riite/2016/271971

Cabero, J. (2013). El aprendizaje autorregulado como marco teórico para la aplicación educativa de las comunidades virtuales y los entornos personales de aprendizaje. TESI, 14(2), 133–156. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2010/201028055006.pdf

Cabero, J. (2014). Los entornos personales de aprendizaje (PLE). Antequera: IC Editorial.

Cabero, J., Barroso, J., & Romero, R. (2015). Aprendizaje a través de un entorno personal de aprendizaje (PLE). Learning based on a Personal Learning Environment (PLE). Bordón, 67(2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2015.67205

Cabero, J., Marín, V., & Infante, A. (2011). Creación de un entorno personal para el aprendizaje: desarrollo de una experiencia. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (38). https://doi.org/10.21556/EDUTEC.2011.38.380

Cabero, J., & Vázquez, A. (2014). Production and evaluation of a Personal Learning Environment for faculty training: analysis of an experience / Producción y evaluación de un Entorno Personal de Aprendizaje para la formación universitaria: análisis de una experiencia. Cultura y Educación, 26(4), 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2014.985944

Churches, A. (2009). Taxonomía de Bloom para la era digital. Eduteka, 1–12. Recuperado a partir de http://www.eduteka.org/TaxonomiaBloomDigital.php

Dabbagh, N. y Fake, H. (2017). College Students’ Perceptions of Personal Learning Environments Through the Lens of Digital Tools, Processes and Spaces. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.215

Durall, E., Gros, B., Maina, M., Johnson, L. y Adams, S. (2012). Perspectivas tecnológicas: educación superior en Iberoamérica 2012-2017. Austin, Texas. Recuperado a partir de http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2012-technology-outlook-iberoamerica_SP.pdf

Infante, A., Gallego, O. y Sánchez, A. (2013). Los gadgets en las plataformas de telefomación: el caso del proyecto Dipro 2.0. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios Y Educación, (42), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.12795/PIXELBIT

Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A. y Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report (Vol. 2). Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Recuperado a partir de http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2011-Horizon-Report.pdf

Johnson, M. W., Prescott, D. y Lyon, S. (2017). Learning in Online Continuing Professional Development: An Institutionalist View on the Personal Learning Environment. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.189

Kuhn, C. (2017). Are Students Ready to (re)-Design their Personal Learning Environment? The Case of the E-Dynamic.Space. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.185

Llorente, M. del C. (2013). Aprendizaje autorregulado y PLE PLE and Self-regulated learning. Edmetic, Revista de Educación Mediática Y TIC, 2(1), 58–75. Recuperado a partir de https://goo.gl/mGZrog

Marascuilo, L. A. y McSweeney, M. (1967). Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin, 67(6), 401–12. Recuperado a partir de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6046734

Marín-Díaz, V. (2014). Training Future Teachers through Virtual Platforms Dipro 2.0 Experience. Indian Journal of Applied Research X, 167(1), 2249–555. Recuperado a partir de https://goo.gl/MiTGvU

Mateo, J. (2004). La investigación ex-post-facto. In R. Bisquerra (Ed.), Metodología de la investigación educativa. (pp. 195–230). Madrid, España: La Muralla.

Prendes, P. y Castañeda, L. (2013). PLE-Centered Education: The Next Boundary. | Lindenwood University. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 2(1). Recuperado a partir de https://goo.gl/7wCfVb

Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2015). Radar de Innovación educativa 2015. Monterrey: Tecnológico de Monterrey.

Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2016). Radar de Tecnología Educativa de preparatoria 2016. Monterrey: Tecnológico de Monterrey.

Tourón, J. (2017). Taxonomía de Bloom, ¿hablamos? Retrieved February 14, 2017, from https://ined21.com/metas-reales-de-aprendizaje-taxonomia-de-bloom/

Vázquez-Cano, E., Martín-Monje, E. y Larreta-Azelain, M. D. de C. (2016). Analysis of PLEs’ implementation under OER design as a productive teaching-learning strategy in Higher Education. A case study at Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia. Digital Education Review, (29), 62–85. Recuperado a partir de http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/15443

Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of Personal Learning Environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820701772660

Downloads

Published

2018-07-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Personal learning environments (PLE) in university students of pedagogy. (2018). Latin American Journal of Educational Technology - RELATEC, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.17.1.25

Similar Articles

1-10 of 510

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>