Use of strategies supported by ICT and virtuality: an opportunity to explore the possibilities of the digital environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.1.57Keywords:
Computer Uses in Education, Educational technology, COVID-19Abstract
During the second semester of 2021, the Laboratory of Educational Technology and Digital Culture of the Faculty of Communications and Philology of the University of Antioquia undertook the diagnosis of the use of strategies supported by ICT virtuality during the years 2020 and 2021, in undergraduate, during the time that the remote emergency education generated by COVID - 19 lasted. The study was carried out from an interpretive constructivist paradigm, with a qualitative approach and from design-based research. The results show that both students and teachers transferred in most cases their traditional practices from face-to-face to digital environments. Some found in this situation an opportunity to creatively explore the new contexts offered by cyberspace and rethink the new training dynamics for the post-pandemic future. The findings of this research aim to contribute to reflection in the field and to the formulation of the Educational Project of the Faculty of Communications and Philology that is under construction.
Downloads
References
Adell, J. & Castañeda, L. (2015). Las pedagogías escolares emergentes. Cuadernos de Pedagogía. 1-8.
Afacom. (2020). Profesiones de la comunicación y transformaciones del mundo del trabajo. Bogotá: Asociación Colombiana de Facultades y Programas de Comunicación (Afacom).
Alvarado, S.V. (2013). La Investigación Cualitativa: Fundamentos e Implicaciones Metodológicas. Manizales: Módulo Maestría en Educación y Desarrollo Humano del Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Niñez y Juventud del Cinde y la Universidad de Manizales.
Amiel, T. & Reeves, T. (2008). Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 29-40.
Angarita, L. C. (2003). La encuesta como técnica de investigación. Elaboración de cuestionarios y tratamiento estadístico de los datos (I). Atención primaria, 31(8), 527-538.
Arias, F.G. (2012). El Proyecto de investigación. Editorial Episteme.
Bejarano, A. G., Angarita, J., & Mesa, C. V. (2013). Implicaciones pedagógicas del uso de las TICs en la educación superior. Revista de Tecnología, 12(3), 36-56.
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640.
Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (2014). Framing the analysis of learning network architectures. En Peter Goodyear & L. Carvalho (Eds.), The architecture of productive learning networks (pp. 48-70). Routledge.
Castañeda, L. y Tur, G. (2020) Resources and Opportunities for Agency in PLE Related Pedagogical Designs: a Literature Exploration. Interaction Design and Architecture(s) Journal - IxD&A, 45, 50 - 68.
Cazarez, L. et al. (1999) Técnicas actuales de investigación documental. Editorial Trillas.
Chilisa, B. y Kawulich, B. (2012) Selecting a research approach: paradigm, methodology and methods. Doing Social Research: A Global Context, 5(1), 51-61.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks.
De Laat, M., y Dohn, N. B. (2019). Is Networked Learning Postdigital Education? Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00034-1
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695–727). Sage Publications Ltd.
Forero Arango, X. (2022). El papel de la interacción en la educación superior: Hacia modelos pedagógicos más flexibles. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, 79, 134-148. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2022.79.2363
Galeano, M. (2007) Diseño de proyectos en la investigación cualitativa. Fondo editorial Universidad Eafit.
Giffords, E. D. (2009). The Internet and social work: The next generation. Families in Society, 90, 413–418.
Escorcia Guzman, J. H., Zuluaga-Ortiz, R. A., Barrios-Miranda, D. A., & Delahoz-Dominguez, E. J. (2022). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in the processes of distribution and use of knowledge in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Procedia Computer Science, 198, 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.300
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2014) Metodología de la investigación, McGraw-Hill / Interamericana Editores,
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hodgson, V., y McConnell, D. (2019). Networked learning and postdigital education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 43–64.
Informe sobre Educación Superior y Covid – 19 (2020) Unidad de Asuntos Curriculares. Universidad de Antioquia. https://view.genial.ly/5ea05ef8d553cd0daa2178fa/presentation-covid-19-y-educacion-superior
Jääskelä, P., Heilala, V., Kärkkäinen, T., & Häkkinen, P. (2021). Student agency analytics: Learning analytics as a tool for analysing student agency in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(8), 790–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1725130
Kawczak, S., Fernandez, A., Frampton, B., Mooney, M., Nowacki, A., Yako, M., & Stoller, J. K. (2021). Observations from transforming a continuing education programme in the COVID-19 era and preparing for the future. Journal of European CME, 10(1), 1964315.
Kennedy-Clark, S. (2015). Reflection: Research by design: Design-based research and the higher degree research student. Journal of Learning Design, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v8i3.257
Kinchin, I. M., Alpay, E., Curtis, K., Franklin, J., Rivers, C., & Winstone, N. E. (2016). Charting the elements of pedagogic frailty. Educational Research, 58(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1129115
Martos Núñez, E., & Martos García, A. (2018). Categorizaciones de la lectura y praxis cultural en la era digital: Distant reading vs. close reading. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, 32(74), 19. https://doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2018.74.57904
Moretti, F. (2016) Lectura Distante. Fondo de cultura económica.
Networked Learning Editorial Collective (NLEC). (2020). Networked Learning: Inviting Redefinition. Postdigital Science and Education. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42438-020-00167-8}
Ocegueda, C. (2004). Metodología de la investigación: Métodos, técnicas y estructuración de trabajos académicos. Edición de la autora.
Pantić, N. (2021). Teachers’ Reflection on their Agency for Change (TRAC): A tool for teacher development and professional inquiry. Teacher Development, 25(2), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1868561
Pardo, H. y Cobo, C. (2020) Expandir la universidad más allá de la enseñanza remota de emergencia. Ideas hacia un modelo híbrido postpandemia. Outliers School.
Pavlič, L., Beranič, T., Brezočnik, L., & Heričko, M. (2022). Towards a novel catalog of assessment patterns for distant education in the information technology domain. Computers & Education, 182, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104470
Park, A., & Awan, O. A. (2022). COVID-19 and Virtual Medical Student Education. Academic Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.04.011
Perrotta, C. (2021). Underdetermination, Assemblage Studies and Educational Technology: Rethinking Causality and Re-Energising Politics. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.1.638
Sandoval, C. (2002) Investigación Cualitativa. Especialización en teoría, métodos y técnicas de investigación social. ARFO Editores e Impresores.
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Strom, K. J. (2015). Teaching as Assemblage: Negotiating Learning and Practice in the First Year of Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115589990
Thompson, L. (2012). Educational uses of second life in the teaching of child and youth work. Relational Child & Youth Care Practice, 25, 43–51.
Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022). Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
