Dados abertos na pesquisa educacional: os repositórios cumprem sua função?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.24.2.123Palavras-chave:
Research Tools, Archives, Online Catalogs, Metadata, Data UseResumo
Situado no contexto digital atual, em que o movimento da ciência aberta representa um novo paradigma para a produção e circulação do conhecimento, este artigo analisa em que medida os repositórios de dados de pesquisa atendem às necessidades técnicas, legais e éticas dos pesquisadores nas áreas da educação e das ciências sociais. A abordagem metodológica combina revisão de literatura, entrevista com especialista e análise de catálogos de repositórios. A partir da fusão dos resultados obtidos, conclui-se que as características mais valorizadas pelos pesquisadores dessas disciplinas são: reputação do repositório, facilidade de uso, disponibilidade de informações contextuais, sustentabilidade (preservação de dados a longo prazo), suporte técnico e conformidade com os princípios FAIR (que promovem a produção de dados Encontráveis, Acessíveis, Interoperáveis e Reutilizáveis). Além disso, o artigo aprofunda o papel que os catálogos de repositórios desempenham ao facilitar a seleção de repositórios adequados para o depósito de dados, oferecendo aos pesquisadores informações úteis para determinar se determinados repositórios atendem às suas necessidades. Este estudo fornece informações valiosas para a promoção da adoção de práticas de dados abertos no campo da pesquisa educacional.
Downloads
Referências
Antonio, M. G., Schick-Makaroff, K., Doiron, J. M., Sheilds, L., White, L., & Molzahn, A. (2020). Qualitative Data Management and Analysis within a Data Repository. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(8), 640-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919881706
Ávila Barrientos, E. (2024). Explorando el papel de los repositorios de datos de investigación en el contexto de la ciencia abierta. Métodos de informacion, 15(28), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.5557/IIMEI15-N28-001029
Barbosa, S., Carson, M., Curtin, L., Diggs, S., Gonzales, S., Herzog, J., Olson, E., Snowden, T., Sweet, S., Van Gulick, A., & Wood, J. (2024). Generalist Repository Selection Flowchart [Graphic]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11105430
Barczak, G., Hopp, C., Kaminski, J., Piller, F., & Pruschak, G. (2022). How open is innovation research? – An empirical analysis of data sharing among innovation scholars. Industry and Innovation, 29(2), 186-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2021.1967727
Behnke, C., Bonino, L., Coen, G., Le Franc, Y., Parland-von Essen, J., Riungu-Kalliosaari, L., & Staiger, C. (2020). D2.3 Set of FAIR data repositories features. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5361952
Benjelloun, O., Chen, S., & Noy, N. (2020). Google Dataset Search by the Numbers. En J. Z. Pan, V. Tamma, C. d’Amato, K. Janowicz, B.
Fu, A. Polleres, O. Seneviratne, & L. Kagal (Eds.), The Semantic Web – ISWC 2020 (Vol. 12507, pp. 667-682). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_41
Bicarregui, J., Gray, N., Henderson, R., Jones, R., Lambert, S., & Matthews, B. (2012). DMP Planning for Big Science Projects (No. arXiv:1208.3754). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1208.3754
Borgman, C. L. (2016). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world . The MIT Press.
Borgman, C. L., Scharnhorst, A., & Golshan, M. S. (2019). Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures: Mediating data sharing and reuse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(8), 888-904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24172
Borycz, J., Olendorf, R., Specht, A., Grant, B., Crowston, K., Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Rice, N. M., Hu, R., & Sandusky, R. J. (2023). Perceived benefits of open data are improving but scientists still lack resources, skills, and rewards. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 339. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01831-7
Casali, A., Motz, R., & Sprock, A. S. (2022). Open Data Management of Research in Education: Knowledge and practices in LATAM. 2022 XVII Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO56648.2022.10013458
European Commission. (2016). Guidelines on FAIR data management in H2020. http://archive.org/details/h2020-hi-oa-data-mgt_en
Gerasimov, I., Kc, B., Mehrabian, A., Acker, J., & McGuire, M. P. (2024). Comparison of datasets citation coverage in Google Scholar,
Web of Science, Scopus, Crossref, and DataCite. Scientometrics, 129(7), 3681-3704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05073-5
Gomes, D. G. E., Pottier, P., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Hudgins, E. J., Foroughirad, V., Sánchez-Reyes, L. L., Turba, R., Martinez, P. A., Moreau,
D., Bertram, M. G., Smout, C. A., & Gaynor, K. M. (2022). Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1987), 20221113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1113
Grattarola, F., Laufer, G., Rodríguez-Tricot, L., González, E. M., & Mello, F. T. de. (2024). Desafíos y barreras para la apertura de datos de biodiversidad en Uruguay. Ecología Austral, 34(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.24.34.3.0.2413
Grattarola, F., Shmagun, H., Erdmann, C., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Thomsen, M., Kim, J., & Mabile, L. (2024). Gaps between Open Science activities and actual recognition systems: Insights from an international survey. PLOS ONE, 19(12), e0315632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315632
Huber, R., Gonzalez Beltran, A., Neidiger, C., Ulrich, R., & L’Hours, H. (2025, enero 20). Towards Transparent Presentation of FAIR-enabling Data Repository Functions & Characteristics. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu24-20387
Krähmer, D., Schächtele, L., & Schneck, A. (2023). Care to share? Experimental evidence on code sharing behavior in the social sciences. PLOS ONE, 18(8), e0289380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289380
Lamb, D., Russell, A., Morant, N., & Stevenson, F. (2024). The challenges of open data sharing for qualitative researchers. Journal of Health Psychology, 29(7), 659-664. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241237620
Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V.,
Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., & Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7
Logan, J. A. R., Hart, S. A., & Schatschneider, C. (2021). Data Sharing in Education Science. AERA Open, 7, 23328584211006475. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211006475
Mabile, L., Shmagun, H., Erdmann, C., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Thomsen, M., & Grattarola, F. (2025). Recommendations on Open Science Rewards and Incentives: Guidance for Multiple Stakeholders in Research. Data Science Journal, 24. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2025-015
Miksa, T., Simms, S., Mietchen, D., & Jones, S. (2019). Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(3), e1006750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
Mosha, N. F. V. (2024). Open Science Movement and Researchers’ Perspectives in Higher Learning Institutions: A Conceptual Framework. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences (PJLSS), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00998
Neild, R. C., Robinson, D., & Agufa, J. (2022). Sharing Study Data: A Guide for Education Researchers. (NCEE 2022- 004). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/sites/default/files/migrated/nces_pubs/ncee/pubs/2022004/pdf/2022004.pdf
OECD. (2020). Enhanced Access to Publicly Funded Data for Science, Technology and Innovation. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/947717bc-en
Pampel, H., Vierkant, P., Scholze, F., Bertelmann, R., Kindling, M., Klump, J., Goebelbecker, H.-J., Gundlach, J., Schirmbacher, P., & Dierolf, U. (2013). Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLOS ONE, 8(11), e78080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
Prosser, A. M. B., Hamshaw, R. J. T., Meyer, J., Bagnall, R., Blackwood, L., Huysamen, M., Jordan, A., Vasileiou, K., & Walter, Z. (2023). When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1635-1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576
Shamsudin, Y. M., Zain, W. M., & Sahid, N. Z. (2025). Determinants of Open Data Repository Adoption Among Malaysian Academic Researchers: A conceptual framework. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI31), Article SI31. https://doi.org/10.21834/e-bpj.v10iSI31.6932
Sharing Study Data: A Guide for Education Researchers | IES. (s.f.). Recuperado 29 de junio de 2025, de https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/resource/tooltoolkit/sharing-study-data-guide-education-researchers
Song, J., Li, C., & Chansanam, W. (2025). Construction of medical scientific data repositories in China: Analysis of survey and recommendations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1544200. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1544200
Strecker, D., Pampel, H., Schabinger, R., & Weisweiler, N. L. (2023). Disappearing repositories: Taking an infrastructure perspective on the long-term availability of research data. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 839-856. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00277
Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M. (2011). Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Thoegersen, J. L., & Borlund, P. (2022). Researcher attitudes toward data sharing in public data repositories: A meta-evaluation of studies on researcher data sharing. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2021-0015
Ulrich, R., Verburg, M., Priddy, M., Huber, R., L’Hours, H., Neidiger, C., Meijas, G., & Davidson, J. (2024). M5.5—Initial repository registry support for discovery of repositories, policies, and interfaces. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10847707
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54677/MNMH8546
Vogt, L., Strömert, P., Matentzoglu, N., Karam, N., Konrad, M., Prinz, M., & Baum, R. (2025). Suggestions for extending the FAIR Principles based on a linguistic perspective on semantic interoperability. Scientific Data, 12(1), 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05011-x
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., Da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Witt, M., Cannon, M., Lister, A., Segundo, W., Shearer, K., Yamaji, K., & Research Data Alliance Data Repository Attributes Working Group. (2024). RDA Common Descriptive Attributes of Research Data Repositories (Versión 1.0). Research Data Alliance. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00103
Zuiderwijk, A., Shinde, R., & Jeng, W. (2020). What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption. PLOS ONE, 15(9), e0239283. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239283
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Gonzalo Torterolo-Silva, Regina Motz
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
