Awakening the interest in technological knowledge using Robotics: an experience in Basic Education for gender equality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.19.2.135Keywords:
Educational Technology, Sex Fairness, Robotics, Programming, Secondary EducationAbstract
The need for technology professionals is growing every day, making it increasingly strategic and attractive. The insertion of women in this context provides opportunities for gender equality. However, the percentage of women in this area is still relatively lower than that of men and in other areas of knowledge. This scenario is evolving, and female participation is gradually increasing thanks to the various initiatives that promote gender equity in education and the job market. This work presents the possibility of building spaces aimed at the participation, encouragement, and training of students in the technology area, focusing on the female audience in public schools. The proposal consists of the development of theoretical-practical workshops with primary contents of robotics and programming coordinated by women. For that, students and teachers in the area of science and mathematics were selected and acted as facilitators and multipliers of the proposal in schools. Despite the lack of knowledge of robotics concepts by teachers and students, an important interest in learning was observed. Regarding the difficulties experienced in the workshop execution, the initiative proved to be a promising mechanism to stimulate learning, awakening curiosity, and interest among the participants, especially the students.
References
Anwar, S., Bascou, N.A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2),19-42. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223
Barbosa, F., Souza, C., Souza Junior, A., & Alves, D. (2018). Mapeamento das pesquisas sobre Robótica Educacional no Ensino Fundamental/ Mapping of researches on Educational Robotics in Elementary School. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 11(3), 331-352. https://dx.doi.org/10.17851/1983-3652.11.3.331-352
Bauer, M. (2002). Análise de conteúdo clássica: uma revisão. En Bauer, M. & Gaskell, G. (Eds.). Pesquisa qualitativa com texto, imagem e som: um manual prático, (pp. 189-217). Petrópolis: Vozes.
Bellas, F., Mallo, A., Naya, M., Souto, D., Deibe, A., Prieto, A., Duro, R.J., & Merdan, M. (2020). STEAM Approach to Autonomous Robotics Curriculum for High School Using the Robobo Robot. En Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W.,
Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (Eds.), Robotics in Education (RiE 2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1023 (pp. 77-89). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_8
Casagrande, L., Schwartz, J., Carvalho, M., & Leszczynski, S. (2005). Mulher e ciência: uma relação possível?. Cadernos de Gênero e Tecnologia, 1(4), 31-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3895/cgt.v1n4.6141
Caballero-Gonzalez, Y., & Muñoz-Repiso, A. (2019). Fortaleciendo habilidades de pensamiento computacional en Educación Infantil: Experiencia de aprendizaje mediante interfaces tangible y gráfica. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 18(2), 133-149. http://dx.medra.org/10.17398/1695-288X.18.2.133
César, D. (2009). Potencialidades e limites da robótica pedagógica livre no processo de (re)construção de conceitos científico-tecnológicos a partir do desenvolvimento de artefatos robóticos. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia. Recuperado de https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/16044
César, D. (2013). Robótica pedagógica livre: uma alternativa metodológica para a emancipação sociodigital e a democratização do conhecimento. Tese de Doutorado. Salvador: Universidade Federal da Bahia. Recuperado de https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/16087
Cesario, G., Silveira, N., Bim, S., & Maciel, C. (2017). Por Mais Mulheres na Computação: análise dos trabalhos publicados no X Women in Information Technology. En Anais do XI Women in Information Technology (pp. 1213-1217). SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/wit.2017.3409
Chou, P. (2018). Little Engineers: Young Children's Learning Patterns in an Educational Robotics Project. En World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WEEF-GEDC.2018.8629609
Feldman, R., & Dagan, I. (1995). Knowledge discovery in textual databases (KDT). En International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 112–117). AAAI Press. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3001335.3001354
Galindo, M. (2016). Gender in science: the impact of equality policies in scientific institutions and practices: The case of Germany. Cadernos Pagu, (47) e164719. https://doi.org/10.1590/18094449201600470019
Hartmann, S., Wiesner, H., & Wiesner-Steiner, A. (2007). Robotics and gender: The use of robotics for the empowerment of girls in the classroom. En Zorn, I., Maas, S., Rommes, E., Schirmer, C., Schelhowe, H. (Eds.), Gender Designs IT. Construction and deconstruction of information society technology (pp. 175–188). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90295-1_12
Hirata, H. & Kergoat, D. (2007). Novas configurações da divisão sexual do trabalho. Cadernos de Pesquisa (37), 595-609. São Paulo: Fundação Carlos Chagas. Recuperado de https://www.scielo.br/pdf/cp/v37n132/a0537132.pdf
Huang, W., Hu, C., & Wu, C. (2018). The Use of Different Kinds of Robots to Spark Student Interest in Learning Computational Thinking. En International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (pp. 11-16). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTICE.2018.00-13
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2018). Síntese de indicadores sociais: uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE. Recuperado de https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101629.pdf
Johnston, R. (2016). Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. En Bhattacharya, P., Vahter, M., Jarsjö, J., Kumpiene, J., Ahmad, A., Sparrenbom, C., Jacks, G., Donselaar, M., Bundschuh, J., Naidu, R. (Eds.). Arsenic Research and Global Sustainability (pp. 12-14). Leiden: CRC Press.
Júnior, W., Santos, L., Manzano, A., Farias, Â., Souza, T., Badji, I., Prietch, S., & Resmini, R. (2019). Techno Girls: oficinas de programação de jogos para estudantes de escolas públicas. En Anais do XIII Women in Information Technology (pp. 11-20). SBC. http://doi:10.5753/wit.2019.6708
Kusuma, I., Utaminingrum, F., & Kakeshita, T. (2018). A Toolkit to Learn Algorithmic Thinking using MBot Robot. IPSJ SIG Technical Report. Japão: Information Processing Society of Japan. Recuperado de https://pt.scribd.com/document/389533315/A-Toolkit-to-Learn-Algorithmic-Thinking-Using-MBot-Robot
Maltese, A., & Tai, R. (2010). Eyeballs in the fridge: sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669-685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Reategui, E., Epstein, D., Lorenzatti, A., & Klemann, M. (2011). Sobek: a Text Mining Tool for Educational Applications. En International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 59-64). CSREA Press. Recuperado de https://search.proquest.com/openview/760d9954b5290142a8a5e6b20eb06a19/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1976357
Riedo, F., Chevalier, M., Magnenat, S., & Mondada, F. (2013). Thymio II, a robot that grows wiser with children. En Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts. (pp. 187-193.). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO.2013.6705527
Saccol, A., Castanho, C., Silva, E., Spies, E., & Alves, V. (2019). Gurias Digitais: Inclusão de Meninas na Área de TI. En Anais do XIII Women in Information Technology (pp. 194-198). SBC. https://doi:10.5753/wit.2019.6736
Santos, C. (2018). Por que as mulheres «desapareceram» dos cursos de computação?. São Paulo: Jornal da USP. Recuperado de https://jornal.usp.br/?p=136701
SBC, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (2017). Educação Superior em Computação Estatísticas – 2017. Relatório Técnico. Recuperado de https://www.sbc.org.br/documentos-da-sbc/send/133-estatisticas/1200-pdf-png-educacao-superior-em-computacao-estatisticas-2017
Screpanti, L., Cesaretti, L., Mazzieri, E., Marchetti, L., Baione, A., & Scaradozzi, D. (2018). An Educational Robotics activity to promote gender equality in STEM Education. En Proccedings of International Conference on Information, Communication Technologies in Education, (pp. 336-346). Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lorenzo_Cesaretti/publication/328997601_An_Educational_Robotics_activity_to_promote_gender_equality_in_STEM_Education/links/5beedcf792851c6b27c36e9f/An-Educational-Robotics-activity-to-promote-gender-equality-in-STEM-Education.pdf
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Wang, M., & Degol, J. (2017). Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
Weinberg, J., Pettibone, J., Thomas, S., Stephen, M., & Stein, C. (2007). The Impact of Robot Projects on Girl’s Attitudes toward Science and Engineering. En Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) Workshop on Research in Robots. Recuperado de https://www.siue.edu/engineering/pdf/WeinbergRSSWorkshop2007.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
