Mapping Surveillance Capitalism in South American Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.1.221Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Higher education, Metadata, Privacy, Public policyAbstract
We are currently witnessing a global increase in the provision of software platforms and services, offered at ‘no cost’ by large corporations, to higher education. The business model behind these services is largely based on the collection and analysis of massive quantities of user data and metadata, collected through educational packages, which include e-mail, video-conferencing, groupware, file sharing, and other integrated services. The penetration of these services in higher education worldwide is largely unknown. In this study we discuss a methodology and a software script developed to collected new data for all 448 public higher education institutions in all 13 countries in South America. The data show that for every ten higher education institutions in the region, eight have services and platforms offered by such businesses. We contend that the adoption of these services is largely due to disinvestment in public education, and threaten the operational autonomy of institutions in regards to research and teaching, while leading to concerns in regards to data control, privacy, and transparency for teachers, administrators and students.
References
Abramovay, R. (2018). Aos dados, cidadãos. https://ricardoabramovay.com/2018/04/aos-dados-cidadaos
Amiel, T., & Soares, T. (2015). O contexto da abertura: Recursos educacionais abertos, cibercultura e suas tensões. Em Aberto, 28(94), 109–122.
Amiel, T. (2020). Educational Content, Openness and Surveillance in the Digital Ecology. In Open at the Margins: Critical Perspectives on Open Education. Rebus. https://press.rebus.community/openatthemargins/
Amiel, T., Pezzo, T. C., Cruz, L. R. da, & Oliveira, L. A. (2021). Os modos de adesão e a abrangência do capitalismo de vigilância na educação brasileira. Perspectiva, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2021.e80582
Albagli, S. (2015). Ciência aberta em questão. In S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel, & A. H. Abdo (Eds.), Ciência aberta, questões abertas. IBICT. http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1060
Anderson, G., & Herr, K. (2015). New Public Management and the new professionalism in education: Framing the issue. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(0), 84. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2222
Busch, C. (2021). Regulation of Digital Platforms as Infrastructures for Services of General Interest. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/wiso/17836.pdf
Cassino, J. F., da Silva Avelino, R., & da Silveira, S. A. (2019). Direitos Humanos, inteligência artificial e privacidade. Monções: Revista de Relações Internacionais Da UFGD, 8(15), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.30612/rmufgd.v8i15.11546
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Cruz, L. R. da, & Venturini, J. R. (2020). Neoliberalismo e crise: O avanço silencioso do capitalismo de vigilância na educação brasileira durante a pandemia da Covid-19. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 28(0), https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.1060
da Silveira, S. A. (2017). Tudo sobre tod@ s: Redes digitais, privacidade e venda de dados pessoais. Edições SESC.
Decuypere, M., Grimaldi, E., & Landri, P. (2021). Introduction: Critical studies of digital education platforms. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1866050
Dijck, J. van. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
Dreesen, T., Akseer, S., Brossard, M., Dewan, P., Giraldo, J.-P., Kamei, A., Mizunoya, S., & Ortiz, J. S. (2020). Promising practices for equitable remote learning: Emerging lessons from COVID-19 education responses in 127 countries.
General Data Protection Regulation, (2016). https://gdpr-info.eu/
Evangelista, R. (2019). Review of Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 246–251. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13132
Evangelista, R., & Firmino, R. (2020). Brazil. Modes of pandemic existence: Territory, inequality, and technology. In L. Taylor, G. Sharma, A. Martin, & S. Jameson (Eds.), Data Justice and COVID-19: Global Perspectives (pp. 100–107). Meatspace Press.
Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In S. Bartling & S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing (pp. 17–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2
Fiebig, T., Gürses, S., Gañán, C. H., Kotkamp, E., Kuipers, F., Lindorfer, M., Prisse, M., & Sari, T. (2021). Heads in the Clouds: Measuring the Implications of Universities Migrating to Public Clouds. ArXiv:2104.09462 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.09462
Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and Capitalism. University of Westminster Press.
Guggenberger, N. (2021). Essential platforms. Stanford Technology Law Review, 24(2), 237–343. https://law.stanford.edu/publications/essential-platforms/
Kwet, M. (2017). Operation Phakisa Education: Why a secret? Mass surveillance, inequality, and race in South Africa’s emerging national e-education system. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i12.8054
SANTOS, L. G. dos. A informação após a virada cibernética. Em: SANTOS, L. G. DOS; KEHL, M. R.; KUCINSKI, B.; PINHEIRO, W. Revolução tecnológica, internet e socialismo. São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2003. p. 9–34.
LGPD, Pub. L. No. 13.709 (2018). http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/Lei/L13709.htm
Lindh, M., & Nolin, J. (2016). Information We Collect: Surveillance and Privacy in the Implementation of Google Apps for Education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(6), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116654917
Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. John Murray.
McGarr, O., & Engen, B. K. (2021). By-passing teachers in the marketing of digital technologies: The synergy of educational technology discourse and new public management practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2010092
Mildebrath, H. (2020). The CJEU judgment in the Schrems II case (PE 652.073; At a Glance). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2020/652073/EPRS_ATA(2020)652073_EN.pdf
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
Morozov, E. (2018). Big Tech: A ascensão dos dados e a morte da política (1a edição). Ubu Editora.
Oddone, A. C. (2021). Alternativas ao capitalismo de vigilância: Uma análise do uso de software livre em instituições públicas de ensino superior brasileiras [Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso, Universidade de Brasília]. https://bdm.unb.br/handle/10483/29010
Parra, H., Cruz, L., Amiel, T., & Marchado, J. (2018). Infraestruturas, economia e política informacional: O caso do Google Suite for education. Mediações, 23(1), 63–99. https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2018v23n1p63
Perrotta, C., & Selwyn, N. (2020). Deep learning goes to school: Toward a relational understanding of AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686017
Santos, L. G. dos. (2003). A informação após a virada cibernética. In L. G. dos Santos, M. R. Kehl, B. Kucinski, & W. Pinheiro (Eds.), Revolução tecnológica, internet e socialismo (pp. 9–34). Fundação Perseu Abramo. https://bibliotecadigital.fpabramo.org.br/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/286/revolucao_tecnologica_internet_e_socialismo.pdf
Saura, G. (2020). Filantrocapitalismo digital en educación: Covid-19, UNESCO, Google, Facebook y Microsoft. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 17(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.5209/tekn.69547
Smyrnaios, N. (2016). L’effet GAFAM: stratégies et logiques de l’oligopole de l’internet. Communication & Langages, 2(188), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.3917/comla.188.0061
UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (p. 34). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf000037994 9
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
Wilbanks, J. T., & Topol, E. J. (2016). Stop the privatization of health data. Nature, 535(7612), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/535345a
Williamson, B. (2019). New power networks in educational technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(4), 395–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1672724
Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in Higher Education: Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
