O envolvimento do aluno no modelo Flipped Classroom implementado na aprendizagem online
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.23.1.43Resumo
O envolvimento do aluno é um fator determinante do sucesso académico dos alunos com acrescida relevância na aprendizagem online. Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o envolvimento cognitivo, afetivo e comportamental dos alunos numa proposta pedagógica baseada no modelo Flipped Classroom, com estudantes do ensino secundário português. O estudo realizado durante a pandemia COVID-19 conjugou aulas assíncronas com síncronas divididas por episódios de aprendizagem (Resumo, Quiz e Salas). Através da utilização de métodos mistos analisaram-se os discursos, comportamentos, perceções sobre a experiência e o desempenho académico dos alunos. Os resultados mostraram que a proposta potenciou um elevado nível de envolvimento comportamental dos alunos expresso pelos indicadores realização das tarefas, interação com os pares e participação. Os alunos apresentaram níveis superiores de envolvimento cognitivo nos episódios Salas por serem propícios à interação com os pares, explicitação de conhecimentos e reflexão facilitada pela interação com a professora. A satisfação foi o indicador mais proeminente do envolvimento afetivo do aluno. Este estudo contribui para um melhor entendimento dos fatores que influenciam o envolvimento do aluno no modelo Flipped Classroom, apresentando implicações práticas para o aprimorar na aprendizagem online.
Downloads
Referências
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C.-N., & Chang, C.-Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 134-142.
Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. [Conference session]. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 103819 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.528
Creswell, J.W., & Clark, V.L. P. (2013). Pesquisa de métodos mistos. Penso.
Eccles, J. (2016). Engagement: Where to next? Learning and Instruction, 43, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003.
Fauzi, S. H. M., & Hussain, R. M. R. (2016). Designing instruction for active and reflective learners in the flipped classroom. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 147–173. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2016.13.2.6
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
King, R. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38. https://doi.org/chqz
Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support. Computers & Education, 89, 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.08.017.
Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., Uden, L., &Yang, C.H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104318.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4), 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2021). Developing a flipped learning approach to support student engagement: A design-based research of secondary school mathematics teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12474
Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923648909526659
O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C., Karanicolas, S., Snelling, C., & Winning, T. (2015). Corrigendum to “the use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.001.
Olakanmi, E. E. (2017). The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9657-x.
Pelikan, E. R., Lüftenegger, M., Holzer, J., Korlat, S., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2021). Learning during COVID-19: The role of self-regulated learning, motivation, and procrastination for perceived competence. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01002-x
Pietarinen, J., Soini, T., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). Students’ emotional and cognitive engagement as the determinants of well-being and achievement in school. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 40–51. https://doi.org/chq3
Riordan, T., Millard, D. E., & Schulz, J. B. (2016). How should we measure online learning activity? Research in Learning Technology, 24. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30088.
Ribeirinha, T., & Silva, B. (2021). The flipped classroom model potential in online learning: an assessment focused on pedagogical interactions. Publicaciones, 51(3), 295-345. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v51i3.18076
Ribeirinha, T., Alves, R., & Silva Duarte, B. (2022). Análise comparativa do modelo Sala de Aula Invertida no contexto presencial e on-line. Revista Conhecimento Online, 2, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.25112/rco.v2.3004
Ruiz, R. D., (2021). Peirats Chacón, J., y Marín Suelves, D. (2020). Estrategias didácticas digitales: Encuentros entre la investigación y la práctica. Calambur. Revista Latinoamericana De Tecnología Educativa-RELATEC, 20(1), 103-104. https://relatec.unex.es/article/view/3975
Rumberger, R. W., & Rotermun, S. (2012). The relationship between engagement and high school dropout. In S. L. Christenson, A. L.
Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 491–513). Springer.
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Van Alten D.C.D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003
Xu, B., Chen, N. S., & Chen, G. (2020). Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Computers & Education, 157, 103956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103956
Zhu, E. (2006). Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions. Instructional Science, 34(6), 451-480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-0004-0
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Teresa Ribeirinha, Bento Silva
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
