Use of open educational resource repositories in pedagogical practices: a systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.19.2.115

Keywords:

Education, Learning Objects, Open Educational Resources, Learning Object Repositories, Information and Communication Technologies

Abstract

The creation of Open Educational Resources (OER) has as its basic principle to provide democratic access to knowledge. To achieve this purpose, OER should be made available in Learning Object Repositories (LOR), and they must have open access. The objective of this research is to identify the use of LOR in pedagogical practices and the support material to be an OER. Data were collected from scientific articles, published from 2014 to 2018, available from the Web of Science, Scopus, DOAJ, ERIC, Redalyc and in institutional repositories of scientific publications made available in Brazil and Spain. The search consisted in identifying articles that reported proposals for teaching-learning practices, using open access resources and repositories. Applying the systematic review methods, 1,201 publications were initially retrieved, and from this list, 42 articles were selected for reading and analysis, as they present relevant content with the theme of this research. It was possible to identify teaching initiatives using OER, practices with the objective of acquiring technological knowledge and using it to promote participatory and collaborative learning with the use of OER. However, it was not possible to identify consolidated practices in the publications, as the OERs presented were not available for free use and, therefore, distanced themselves from the concept of open access.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Flavio Ferreira Borges, Universidade Federal de Brasília - UnB

    PhD student in Education at the Graduate Program in Education at the University of Brasilia (UnB), in the research line Technologies and Communication in Education (ETEC), in Cotutela regime with the National University of Education at Distânia (UNED), Madrid / ES. Master in Computer Science from the Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), specialization in Educational Informatics from the Federal University of Lavras in Minas Gerais (UFLA). Graduated in Mathematics from the University of Rio Verde (UniRV) in Goiás. Adjunct Professor II at the Federal University of Jataí (UFJ) in Goiás, assigned to the Computer Science course.

  • Janaína Angelina Teixeira, University of Brasília (Brazil)

    Pedagogue, specialist in distance education, MSc in administration, is currently a PhD in education student at University of Brasilia/UnB, Brazil. Janaina has already given lectures on tutor training, teacher training and pedagogical tools for teaching practice  in institutions such as INEP and UnB. She is a substitute professor at the Faculty of Education of the University of Brasília, Department of Planning and Administration. She's senior researcher in the cooperation term 01/2015 MJ / SENACON and FUB / CDT - Prospecting of information technologies applied to public policies for protection of consumer protection . She worked as a tutor at the Open University of Brazil, in the pedagogical course from 2012 to 2015, she was a pedagogical coordinator of courses in the distance modality for several public and private agencies, among them: TRE-AM, SEBRAE-National; ABRANDH; Federal Court of the Federal District; Ministry of Labor and FIOCRUZ, she's was coordinator  pedagogical in the Technical Training Program in Mediation and Conciliation of the National School of Mediation and Conciliation - ENAM,  from 2012 to 2015. She was pedagogical supervisor in the project Development of Innovative Processes for Formulation of Public Policies of Volunteering in Mega-events. She is a researcher in the area of active methodologies, distance education, teacher training, gamification, mobile technologies and innovation in services.

  • Sara Osuna Acedo, National University of Distance Education (Spain)

    Sara Osuna-Acedo has been a doctor of Philosophy and Educational Sciences from UNED since 2004. She is a professor of Communication and Education at UNED.
    Her lines of research are MOOCs (sMOOC and tMOOC), media convergence, digital scenarios, disability and design for all, digital learning and social networks, publishing scientific articles in top-level international magazines.
    She coordinated the European project "(ECO)" Elearning, Communication and Open-data Mobile, Massive and Ubiquitous Learning ", for 3 years, where 21 partners from nine different countries participated. She has also been a researcher in recent competitive research projects, being the last "Transalphabetismo. Transmedia competences and informal strategies for adolescent learning "from the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
    Lastly, at UNED, she took the position of Coordinator of Institutional Courses for 3 years, and Deputy Vice-Rector for Ongoing Formation for four years.

References

Amiel, T., & Soares, T. C. (2016). Identifying Tensions in the Use of Open Licenses in OER Repositories. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2426

Aparici, R., & Osuna Acedo, S. (2013). La cultura de la participación. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 4(2), 137–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2013.4.2.07

Atenas, J., & Havemann, L. (2014). Questions of quality in repositories of open educational resources: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20889

Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities. A Report to The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, 84.

Barbosa, C. M. A. M. (2012). A aprendizagem mediada por TIC: interação e cognição em perspectiva. Revista Brasileira de Aprendizagem Aberta e a Distância, 11, 83–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.17143/rbaad.v11i0.242

CAPES, C. de A. de P. de N. S. (2014). Documento de orientação de avalição: Critérios de Classificação Qualis—Ensino (p. 9). Brasília: Ministério da Educação.

Carvalho, M. (2019). Recursos educacionais abertos na Universidade Aberta. A rede como estratégia de comunicação e sustentabilidade. Cadernos BAD, 0(1), 201–211.

Cebrián-Robles, V., Raposo-Rivas, M., & Duarte-Freitas, M. do C. (2018). Acceso libre y antiplagio en los repositorios institucionales y bibliotecas de las Facultades de Educación en España. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa - RELATEC, 17(2), 41–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.17.2.41

Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., & Manouselis, N. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 1098–1106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026

Colomé, D. (2019). Objetos de Aprendizaje y Recursos Educativos Abiertos en Educación Superior. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (69), 89–101. doi: 10.21556/edutec.2019.69.1221

Coughlan, T., & Perryman, L.-A. (2015, abril 22). Learning from the innovative open practices of three international health projects outside academia. Apresentado em Open Education Global Conference 2015, Banff, Alberta, Canada. Recuperado de http://conference.oeconsortium.org/2015/

Downes, S. (2007). Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 3, 029–044. doi: https://doi.org/10.28945/384

Galvão, T. F., Pansani, T. de S. A., & Harrad, D. (2015). Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, 24(2), 335–342. doi: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017, novembro). Mapeos sistemáticos de literatura, revisiones sistemáticas de literat…. Educación apresentado em Grupo GRIAL, Salamanca/España. Recuperado de https://es.slideshare.net/grialusal/mapeos-sistemticos-de-literatura-revisiones-sistemticas-de-literatura-y-benchmarking-de-programas-formativos/grialusal/mapeos-sistemticos-de-literatura-revisiones-sistemticas-de-literatura-y-benchmarking-de-programas-formativos

Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (4a). São Paulo: Atlas.

Gil, J. (2018). Interconectados apostando por la construcción colectiva del conocimiento aprendizaje móvil en educación infantil y primaria. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i54.10

Gordillo Méndez, A., Barra Arias, E., & Quemada Vives, J. (2018). Estimación de Calidad de Objetos de Aprendizaje en Repositorios de Recursos Educativos Abiertos Basada en las Interacciones de los Estudiantes. Educación XX1, 21(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20196

Hanief Bhat, M. (2010). Interoperability of open access repositories in computer science and IT – an evaluation. Library Hi Tech, 28(1), 107–118. doi: 10.1108/07378831011026724

Hennessy, S., Haßler, B., & Hofmann, R. (2015). Pedagogic change by Zambian primary school teachers participating in the OER4Schools professional development programme for one year. Research Papers in Education, 31(4), 399–427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1073343

Heredia, J. de M., Rodrigues, R. S., & Vieira, E. M. F. (2017). Produção científica sobre Recursos Educacionais Abertos. Transinformação, 29(1), 101–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892017000100010

Hodgins, H. W. (2002). The future of learning objects. In D. A. Wiley, D. S. Hueston, M. F. Sullivan, & P. Harris (Orgs.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (p. 299). Bloomington, Indiana: Printed by Tichenor Printing.

Koutsomitropoulos, D. A., & Solomou, G. D. (2018). A learning object ontology repository to support annotation and discovery of educational resources using semantic thesauri. IFLA Journal, 44(1), 4–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035217737559

Leffa, V. J. (2016). Uma Outra Aprendizagem é Possível: Colaboração em Massa, Recursos Educacionais Abertos e Ensino de Línguas. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, 55(2), 353–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/010318134942176081

Lynch, C. A. (2003). Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure For Scholarship In The Digital Age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327–336. doi: 10.1353/pla.2003.0039

Marta-Lazo, C., Frau-Meigs, D., & Osuna-Acedo, S. (2018). Collaborative lifelong learning and professional transfer. Case study: ECO European Project. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1451346

Martín, A. G., & González, A. T. (2018). Educación Mediática y su Didáctica. Una Propuesta para la Formación del Profesorado en TIC y Medios. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 91(32.1), 15–27.

Miller, P. (2000). Interoperability: What Is It and Why Should I Want It? Ariadne, (24). Recuperado de http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/24/interoperability/

Miró, J. D. V., Baquero-Arnal, P., Civera, J., Turró, C., & Juan, A. (2018). Multilingual Videos for MOOCs and OER. Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 1–12.

Mitchell, C., & Chu, M. (2014). Open Education Resources: The New Paradigm in Academic Libraries.

Montoya, M. S. R. (2015). Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 103–118. doi: 10.14201/eks2015161103118

Morales, L. D. G., & Montoya, M. S. R. (2014). Uso de recursos educativos abiertos (REA) y objetos de aprendizaje (OA) en educación básica. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 15(2), 86–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.11888

Moran, J. M. (2006). Ensino e aprendizagem inovadores com tecnologias audiovisuais e telemáticas. In J. M. Moran, M. T. Masetto, & M. A. Behrens (Orgs.), Novas Tecnologias e Mediação Pedagógica (10a). Campinas/SP: Papirus.

OCDE. (2007). Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Educational Resources. France: Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Económico. Recuperado de https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/giving-knowledge-for-free_9789264032125-en

Osuna Acedo, S., & Escaño González, C. (2016). MOOC: transitando caminos educomunicativos hacia el conocimiento democratizado, abierto y común. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 7(2), 3–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2016.7.2.20

Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nedungadi, P., Diwakar, S., & Bose, R. (2014). The VLAB OER experience: Modeling potential-adopter student acceptance. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57, 235–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2294152

Ribeiro, L. A. M., & Gasque, K. C. G. D. (2015). Letramento Informacional e Midiático para professores do século XXI. Em Questão, 21(2), 203. doi: https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245212.203-221

Rodrigues Rezende, L. V., Lima Torres, D., & Cruz-Riascos, S. (2016). Herramientas de acceso abierto en la Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brasil: Una prospección. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 39(2), 163–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v39n2a07

Roeder, I., Severengiz, M., Stark, R., & Seliger, G. (2017). Open Educational Resources as a Driver for Manufacturing-related Education for Learning of Sustainable Development. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 81–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.010

Ruiz, C. J. G., Gómez, S. M., & Navarro, A. V. (2018). Portales educativos: La producción de materiales didácticos digitales. @tic. revista d’innovació educativa, (20), 89–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.7203/attic.20.12139

Ruiz-Iniesta, A., Jiménez-Díaz, G., & Gómez-Albarrán, M. (2014). A Semantically Enriched Context-Aware OER Recommendation Strategy and Its Application to a Computer Science OER Repository. IEEE Transactions on Education, 57(4), 255–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2014.2309554

Sánchez García, J. M., & Toledo Morales, P. (2015). Aproximación al uso de recursos educativos abiertos para ciencias sociales en educación secundaria y bachillerato. Prisma Social: revista de investigación social, 1(15), 222–253.

Silva, M. (2010). Sala de aula interativa (Edição: 7a). Edições Loyola.

Teles, L. F. (2015). Dimensões da aprendizagem colaborativa no design e gerenciamento de ambientes online. ARTEFACTUM - Revista de estudos em Linguagens e Tecnologia, 11(2). Recuperado de http://artefactum.rafrom.com.br/index.php/artefactum/article/view/780

Torres, P. L., Behrens, M. A., & Moreira Matos, E. (2015). Prática pedagógica numa visão complexa na educação presencial e a distância: Os ´REAS´ como recurso para pesquisar, ensinar e aprender. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 15, 443. doi: https://doi.org/10.7213/dialogo.educ.15.045.DS04

Torres-Diaz, J. C., Valdiviezo, P., & Jara, D. I. (2013). Integración de redes sociales y entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Revista de Educación a distancia, 35, 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0390-2

Tovar Gutiérrez, D. M., López Ibarra, A., & Ramírez Montoya, M. S. (2014). Estrategias de comunicación para potenciar el uso de Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA) a través de repositorios y metaconectores. Innovar, 24(52), 67–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n52.42523

UNESCO. (2002, julho). Forum on the Impact of Open Courseware for Higher Education in Developing Countries.
UNESCO Digital Library, Paris. Recuperado de https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000128515

UNESCO. (2015). Guía Básica de Recursos Educativos Abiertos (REA). Recuperado 5 de junho de 2019, de Organização das Nações Unidas para a Educação, a Ciência e a Cultura website: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232986

Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: Una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clínica, 135(11), 507–511. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

Vygotsky, L. S., & Schilling, C. (2003). Psicologia Pedagógica. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Whyte, S., Schmid, E. C., Thompson, S. van H., & Oberhofer, M. (2014). Open educational resources for CALL teacher education: The iTILT interactive whiteboard project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 122–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818558

Wiley, D. A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D. A. Wiley (Org.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version (1a). online: reusability.org. Recuperado de http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc

Wiley, D. A. (2008). The Learning Objects Literature. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll, Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (3a, p. 345–354). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Wiley, D., Waters, S., Dawson, D., Lambert, B., Barclay, M., Wade, D., & Nelson, L. (2004). Overcoming the Limitations of Learning Objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 507–521.

Zancanaro, A., Todesco, J. L., & Ramos, F. (2015). A bibliometric mapping of open educational resources. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1960

Published

2020-12-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Use of open educational resource repositories in pedagogical practices: a systematic review. (2020). Latin American Journal of Educational Technology - RELATEC, 19(2), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.19.2.115

Similar Articles

11-20 of 503

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>