Immersive learning ecosystems: The synergy of ChatGPT and metaverse in a higher education institute of technology in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.24.2.161Keywords:
Immersive Learning Ecosystem, ChatGPT , Metaverse, Technological Higher Institutes, EcuadorAbstract
This study explores the challenges and benefits of integrating ChatGPT and the metaverse at a higher education institute of technology in Ecuador, with an emphasis on two barriers—the digital divide and lack of training—that limit access to and the effectiveness of innovative teaching methods. Using a qualitative methodology, data was collected through semi-structured interviews, demonstration classes, and structured observation by involving 12 students and 3 professors. During the practical activities, participants shared their perceptions and experiences. The findings highlight that the metaverse facilitates the understanding of complex concepts and encourages collaboration in simulated environments, while ChatGPT promotes autonomy and personalization in learning. The use of ChatGPT to solve basic queries also reduced the teaching load and allowed professors to focus on facilitation and evaluation of student performance. However, challenges such as limited connectivity, inadequate equipment, and lack of prior experience hindered initial implementation. The participants emphasized that pedagogical guidelines were helpful in structuring the use of these tools. The study concludes that the synergy between ChatGPT and metaverse can transform higher education. However, it is necessary to provide specialized training and have inclusive policies to ensure equity and effectiveness in students’ access to these emerging technologies.
Downloads
References
Albuja Loachamin, L. F., Alvear Loor, J. G., & Sarango Romero, V. J. (2023). Desigualdades tecnológicas en la educación en Ecuador: Abordando la brecha educativa. Revista Educación y Sociedad, 4(2), 238–251.
Angrosino, M. (2012). Etnografía y observación participante en investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
Barráez-Herrera, D. (2022). Metaversos en el contexto de la educación virtual. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.0, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.37843/rted.v13i1.300D
Bonilla, O., & Muñoz, D. (2022). Educación rural mediada por tecnología tradicional en Colombia: Una mirada desde la pandemia. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.31908/19098367.2778
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Castellà, J. (2023, julio 25). ChatGPT y la revolución de la educación: Aplicaciones prácticas y posibilidades futuras. XMetaverso. https://www.xmetaverso.com/chatgpt-y-la-revolucion-de-la-educacion-aplicaciones-practicas-y-posibilidades-futuras
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fabris, C. P., Rathner, J. A., Fong, A. Y., & Sevigny, C. P. (2019). Virtual reality in higher education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 27(8), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.27.08.006
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Galli, M. G., & Kanobel, M. C. (2023). ChatGPT en educación superior: Explorando sus potencialidades y sus limitaciones. Revista Educación Superior y Sociedad, 35(2), 174–195. https://doi.org/10.54674/ess.v34i2.815
González Alcaide, G. (2024). 1 d. C. (después de ChatGPT): Inteligencia artificial generativa en la educación superior. Universitat de València.
Hostinger. (2023, septiembre 5). ¿Qué es un Prompt? Definición clara con ejemplos. Hosting TG. https://www.hostingtg.com/blog/que-es-prompt/
Jofre, C. M. (2023). ChatGPT, inteligencia artificial y universidad: Nuevas tensiones, transformaciones y desafíos en la educación superior. Campo Universitario. https://campouniversitario.aduba.org.ar/ojs/index.php/cu/article/view/79
Kvale, S. (2008). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208963
López, E., & Rahwan, I. (2024, octubre 24). Los humanos ya repiten palabras que aprenden de ChatGPT, como ‘ahondar’ o ‘meticuloso’. El País. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2024-10-24/los-humanos-ya-repiten-palabras-que-aprenden-de-chatgpt-como-ahondar-o-meticuloso.html
López-Belmonte, J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & Lampropoulos, G. (2023). Metaverse in education: A systematic review / Metaverso en educación: Una revisión sistemática. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(73), Artículo 2. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.511421
Malinka, K., Perešíni, M., Firc, A., Hujňák, O., & Januš, F. (2023). On the educational impact of ChatGPT: ¿Is artificial intelligence ready to obtain a university degree? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11146
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4ª ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mollick, E. (2024, octubre 3). Los estudiantes que usan la IA como muleta no aprenden nada. El País. https://elpais.com/tecnologia/2024-10-03/ethan-mollick-analista-los-estudiantes-que-usan-la-ia-como-muleta-no-aprenden-nada.html
Observatorio del Instituto Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2024). Educación digital en las universidades: Informe de tendencias y desafíos. https://observatorio.tec.mx/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/IFE-insights-Report-Educacion-Digital-en-las-universidades.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4ª ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ramos, D. (2024, marzo 29). Prompt Engineering, ¿qué es y dónde puedo aprenderlo? INCAE. https://incae.edu/prompt-engineering-que-es-y-donde-puedo-aprenderlo-2/
Romero Carbonell, M., Romeu Fontanillas, T., Guitert Catasús, M., & Baztán Quemada, P. (2023). La transformación digital en la educación superior: El caso de la UOC. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.33998
Torres Vargas, J. D. (2023). La inteligencia artificial (IA) en la educación superior: Retos y oportunidades. Dialéctica, (21), 376–387.
UNESCO. (2023). Informe de seguimiento de la educación en el mundo 2023: Tecnología en la educación. Learning Portal. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388894
Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
Wang, K., Ramos, J., & Lawrence, R. (2023). ChatEd: A chatbot leveraging ChatGPT for an enhanced learning experience in higher education. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.00052
Wei, X., Jin, X., & Fan, M. (2022). Communication in immersive social virtual reality: A systematic review of 10 years' studies. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.01365
Zapata, C. (2020). The digital divide in the university: The appropriation of ICT in higher education students from Bogotá, Colombia. Comunicar, 28(2), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3916/C68-2020-03
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Patricio Andino-Sosa, Javier Calvache-Sánchez, Silvana Ortiz-Armas, Iván Moncayo-Alarcón

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).





