Development of TPACK among Pre-Service EFL Teachers: Cooperative Learning Readiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.25.2.181Keywords:
Preservice Teacher Education, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Cooperative Learning, Technology Integration, Mixed Methods Research, TPACKAbstract
Effective technology integration in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction requires pre-service teachers to develop robust Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) frameworks to incorporate technology in EFL instruction. However, effectively improving this integrative knowledge poses a persistent challenge in pre-service teacher education, particularly in resource-limited settings. The present study sought to evaluate the role of cooperative readiness, which is considered as the preparedness to cooperate and adapt within a group in progressing TPACK among Iranian pre-service EFL teachers enrolled in final-year programs at three public teacher training institutions in Tehran. In this explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, the quantitative phase included 120 pre-service teachers who completed validated scales evaluating TPACK and cooperative readiness. The results indicated that cooperative readiness is a significant predictor of TPACK, explaining a substantial share of its variance. The qualitative phase including semi-structured interviews with 15 participants provided deeper insights into this relationship. Thematic analysis identified three key mechanisms through which collaboration fosters the development of TPACK by facilitating the dialogic co-construction of integrative knowledge through peer negotiation and reflection, alleviating technological anxiety and creating a supportive environment for experimentation, and adapting theoretical knowledge to real-world classroom constraints by serving as a bridge. Empirically, the findings indicated the synergistic relationship between collaborative competence and technological-pedagogical expertise, while practically suggesting that teacher education programs should extend beyond standalone technology courses and deliberately design collaborative learning experiences to effectively prepare pre-service teachers for the demands of technology-integrated language instruction.
Downloads
References
Abbasi Kasani, H., Shams Mourkani, G., Seraji, F., Rezaeizadeh, M., & Abedi, H. (2020). E-learning challenges in Iran: A research synthesis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4677
Ahmed, H. M., El-Sabagh, H. A., & Elbourhamy, D. M. (2025). Effect of gamified, mobile, cloud-based learning management system (GMCLMS) on student engagement and achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), Article 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00541-1
Aydin, S. (2013). Teachers' perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.654495
Baser, D., Kopcha, T. J., & Ozden, M. Y. (2016). Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) assessment for preservice teachers learning to teach English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1047456
Belda-Medina, J., & Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2022). Integrating augmented reality in language learning: Pre-service teachers' digital competence and attitudes through the TPACK framework. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12123–12146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11123-3
Benade, L. (2015). Teachers' critical reflective practice in the context of twenty-first century learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.998159
Bañados, E. (2006). A blended-learning pedagogical model for teaching and learning EFL successfully through an online interactive multimedia environment. CALICO Journal, 23(3), 533-550. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i3.533-550
Carlson, J., Cooper, R., Daehler, K. R., Friedrichsen, P. J., Heller, J. I., Kirschner, S., Elliott, N. L., Marangio, K., & Wong, N. (2019). Vignettes illustrating practitioners’ and researchers’ applications of the refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge. Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Science, 95-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_3
Chenari, M. U., Sarvestani, M. S., Azarkhavarani, A. R., Izadi, S., & Cirella, G. T. (2024). Enhancing E-learning in higher education: Lessons learned from the pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241268433
Chai, C. S. (2018). Teacher professional development for science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A review from the perspectives of technological pedagogical content (TPACK). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0400-7
Gurvitch, R., & Metzler, M. W. (2009). The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.006
Johari, A. (2002). Meeting the cultural challenges of instructional technology in Iran. Educational Media International, 39(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980210154281
Karbalaei, A. (2025). We believe in CLT, but…’: Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions and implementation challenges. GIST – Education and Learning Research Journal, 31(31). https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.2058
Kim, A. (2025). Impact of systematic support in teacher education and professional development on training-teaching alignment and instructional quality. Journal for STEM Education Research. Advance online publication, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00154-3
Kosmas, P., & Zaphiris, P. (2023). Improving students' learning performance through technology-enhanced embodied learning: A four-year investigation in classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11051–11074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11466-x
Li, M. (2025). Exploring the digital divide in primary education: A comparative study of urban and rural mathematics teachers' TPACK and attitudes towards technology integration in post-pandemic China. Education and Information Technologies, 30(2), 1913–1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12890-x
Lim, C. P., Chai, C. S., & Churchill, D. (2011). A framework for developing pre-service teachers' competencies in using technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.576512
Looker, E. D. (2010). Digital distance: Geographic and cultural divides in access and use of computers and the internet. Digital Diversity, 37-58. https://doi.org/10.51644/9781554582037-003
Maor, D. (2017). Using TPACK to develop digital pedagogues: A higher education experience. Journal of Computers in Education, 4(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-016-0055-4
Matsko, K. K., Ronfeldt, M., Nolan, H. G., Klugman, J., Reininger, M., & Brockman, S. L. (2020). Cooperating teacher as model and coach: What leads to student teachers' perceptions of preparedness? Journal of Teacher Education, 71(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118791992
Mexhuani, B. (2025). Adopting digital tools in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and theoretical insights. European Journal of Education, 60(1), Article e12819. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12819
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Brush, T. A., Strycker, J., Gronseth, S., Roman, T., Abaci, S., ... & Plucker, J. (2012). Preparation versus practice: How do teacher education programs and practicing teachers align in their use of technology to support teaching and learning? Computers & Education, 59(2), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.014
Ouyang, F., Hu, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). In-service teachers' knowledge building during face-to-face collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 107, Article 103479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103479
Quintana, M. G. B., & Fernández, S. M. (2015). A pedagogical model to develop teaching skills: The collaborative learning experience in the Immersive Virtual World TYMMI. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.016
Rojo, M., Gersib, J., Powell, S. R., Shen, Z., King, S. G., Akther, S. S., ... & Lin, X. (2024). A meta-analysis of mathematics interventions: Examining the impacts of intervention characteristics. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09843-0
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Ting, Y. L. (2015). Tapping into students' digital literacy and designing negotiated learning to promote learner autonomy. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.004
Tseng, J. J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531
Solak, E. (2024). Revolutionizing language learning: How ChatGPT and AI are changing the way we learn languages. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.732
Yildiz Durak, H., Atman Uslu, N., Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., & Güler, B. (2023). Examining the predictors of TPACK for integrated STEM: Science teaching self-efficacy, computational thinking, and design thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 7927–7954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11505-7
Zain, D. S., & A. Bowles, F. (2024). What do our future EFL teachers think about using mobile devices in class? Applied Research on English Education (AREE), 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26714/aree.2.1.2024.1-14
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alireza Karbalaei, Hamid Heydari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
Authors retain copyright over their works and grant the journal the right of first publication. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which allows third parties to share, copy, distribute, publicly communicate, adapt, transform, and reuse the work in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that authorship is properly acknowledged, the original source is cited, a link to the license is included, and any changes made are indicated. Note: This license applies to articles published from Vol. 25, No. 2, 2026 onwards.
Authors may enter into separate and additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the article —for example, its deposit in an institutional repository or its subsequent inclusion in a book—, provided that it is clearly stated that the work was first published in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to deposit and disseminate their work on the Internet, for example, in institutional repositories, institutional websites, or personal websites before, during, and after the review and publication process, as this may foster scholarly exchange, increase the visibility of the work, and enable broader and faster dissemination of the published research.
