Co-design of open educational practices in a distance university
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.18.2.151Keywords:
Design Based Research, Learning (Co)Design, Open Educational Practices, Transversal Competences, Curricular DesignAbstract
This paper focuses on the analysis of a co-design process of open educational practices (OEP) for the development of transversal competences in a distance university. Through the active participation of teachers, students and researchers, the aim is to facilitate the curricular design of OEP, which favors the development of students’ transversal competences. The study is part of a broader research that applies the model of design-based research (DBR). Specifically, this paper deals with the analysis of the design phase, with a qualitative approach, by using participant observation and the analysis of the design products elaborated in the co-design process. The study aims to answer the following research questions: How is the co-design method carried out and how does it contribute to the design of OEP for the development of transversal competences? What kind of contributions do participants make and what role do they assume in the co-design process? The results reflect the dynamics of the co-design process, the type of contributions and roles assumed by each participant and the effective contribution of the co-design method for the design of the PEA, considering on one hand the degree of understanding and incorporation of the relevant concepts in the designed scenarios and, secondly, the usefulness of the design instruments used.
Downloads
References
Ayuste, A., Escofet, A., Obiols, N. y Masgrau, M. (2016). Aprendizaje-servicio y co-diseño en la formación de maestros: vías de integración de las experiencias y perspectivas de los estudiantes. Bordón Revista de Pedagogía 68 (2), pp.169-183, ISSN: 0210-5934, e-ISSN: 2340-6577. Recuperado a partir de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/BORDON/article/view/38588
Barberá, E., García, I., y Noguera, I. (2015). Empowering students by co-designing expanded learning scenarios. Conference: European Distance and E-Learning Network 2015 Annual Conference. Expanding Learning Scenarios. Opening Out the Educational Landscape. Barcelona. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279709011_Empowering_students_by_co-designing_expanded_learning_scenarios
Barberà, E., García, I. y Fuertes, M. (2017). A co-design process microanalysis: stages and facilitators of an inquiry-based and technology-enhanced learning scenario. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18 (6). Recuperado a partir de: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1155791.pdf
Baxter, M. B. (2006). Intellectual development in the college years. Change, 38(3), 50–54.
Brewer, J. D. (2000). Ethnography. Buckingham: Open University Press
Bolívar, A. (2002). ¿De nobis ipsis silemus?": Epistemología de la investigación biográfico-narrativa en educación REDIE 4 (1). Ensenada may. 2002. ISSN 1607-4041
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., and Felten, P. (2011) Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design and curricula: implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16 (2). pp. 133-145. ISSN 1360-144X. Recuperado a partir de: http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/54132/
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., y Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195–208.
Bruner, J. (1988). Realidad mental, mundos posibles. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Cameron, L. y Tanti, M. (2011) Students as learning designer: using social media to scaffold the experience. ELearning papers, 27.
Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., y Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dunne, E. y Zandstra, R. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. University of Exeter. ESCalate: Bristol, UK.
Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 3, 123–141.
Garcia, I. (2014). Analyzing university students´ participation in the co-design of learning scenarios. 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Boulder, Colorado, USA. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288167808_Analyzing_university_students'_participation_in_the_co-design_of_learning_scenarios
Gros, B., Escofet, A. y Marimón-Martí, M. (2016). Los patrones de diseño como herramientas para guiar la
práctica del profesorado. RELATEC Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, Vol. 15(3) 1125. ISSN 1695288X. DOI:10.17398/1695288X.15.3.11. Recuperado a partir de: http://relatec.unex.es/article/view/2650/1923
Karunanayaka, S., Naidu, S., Rajendra, J., y Ratnayake, H. (2015). From OER to OEP: shifting practitioner perspectives and practices with innovative learning experience design. Open Praxis, 7 (4). 339–350 (ISSN 2304-070X) ICDE. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.7.4.252. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.openpraxis.org/index.php/OpenPraxis/article/view/252
Kawulich, B. (2005). La observación participante como método de recolección de datos. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Volumen 6, No. 2, Art. 43. ISSN 1438-5627. Recuperado a partir de: http://diverrisa.es/uploads/documentos/LA-OBSERVACION-PARTICIPANTE.pdf
Manefield, J., Collins, R., Moore, J.Mahar, S. y Warne, C. (2007). Student Voice: A historical perspective and new directions. Research and Innovation Division, Office of Learning and Teaching, Department of Education, Melbourne, paper no. 10. Recuperado a partir de: https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/publ/research/publ/Student_Voice_report.pdf
Marshall, C. y Rossman, G. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McKenney, S. y Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. NY: Routledge.
Mor, Y., Warburton, S. y Winters, N. (2012) Participatory pattern workshops: a methodology for open learning design inquiry. Research In Learning Technology. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.19197. Recuperado a partir de: https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/1365/html
Mortera, F., Salazar, A. y Rodríguez, J. (2013) Desarrollo de competencias educativas para la búsqueda, selección y uso de REA en ambientes de educación a distancia. En Ramírez, M.L (Eds.) Competencias Docentes y Prácticas Educativas Abiertas en Educación a Distancia (pp.84-103). México. ISBN: 978-1-304-16705-7. Recuperado a partir de: https://repositorio.itesm.mx/handle/11285/578149
Noguera, I., Usart, M., García, I., Escofet, A. y Barberà, E. (2014). La Participación de los Estudiantes en el Diseño de Escenarios de Aprendizaje. Congreso Modelos flexibles de formación: una respuesta a las necesidades actuales. Revista CIDUI. España. ISSN: 2385-6203. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.cidui.org/revistacidui/index.php/cidui/article/viewFile/596/572
OPAL (2012). The OPAL Report 2011 “Beyond OER: Shifting Focus to Open Educational Practices”, The “Open Educational Quality Initiative”. Recuperado a partir de: http://oer-quality.org/
Robledo, J. (2009). Observación Participante: informantes claves y rol del investigador. Nure Investigación, nº 42, Septiembre – Octubre.
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W.R. y Schechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Bloomington, IN.
Rudduck, J. (2007). Student voice, student engagement and school reform. In D. Thiessen y A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International Handbook of Student Experience in Elementary and Secondary School (pp. 587–610). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
The Design-Based Research Collective (2003). Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32 (1), 5–8. Recuperado a partir de: http://www.designbasedresearch.org/reppubs/DBRC2003.pdf
Wang, F. y Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. Recuperado a partir de: http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
