Atitudes dos professores sobre inovação com ferramentas TIC multissensoriais em ambientes inclusivos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.19.2.29Palavras-chave:
Atitudes de Ensino, Tecnologias Multissensoriais, Aprendizagem incorporada, Desenvolvimento Profissional de Professores, Educação inclusivaResumo
Há evidências de que a utilização de jogos digitais baseados em ferramentas multissensoriais proporciona benefícios em diferentes dimensões da aprendizagem para alunos com necessidades educacionais especiais. No entanto, o uso dessas ferramentas em salas de creches e escolas de ensino fundamental para favorecer a inclusão desses alunos não tem sido tratado em profundidade. O objetivo do trabalho é analisar como a participação de um grupo de professores em um programa de desenvolvimento profissional voltado para a integração em sala de aula de jogos baseados em tecnologias multissensoriais, contribuiu para evoluir suas atitudes quanto à adoção dessas tecnologias em contextos. escolares de uma perspectiva inclusiva. Nesta pesquisa, foi utilizado um método misto com uma estratégia sequencial explicativa. As técnicas e instrumentos utilizados, entrevistas e questionários, permitiram-nos recolher dados sobre a evolução das preocupações pedagógicas após a formação recebida no âmbito do Projecto Europeu INTELed. Os resultados mostram que os professores valorizaram muito as colaborações que surgiram no projeto, e experimentaram uma evolução para maiores graus de preocupação em relação à sustentabilidade e transferência deste tipo de inovações em sala de aula.
Downloads
Referências
Anderson, M.L. (2003). Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00054-7
Anderson, J. L. y Wall, S. D. (2016). Kinecting physics: Conceptualization of motion through visualization and embodiment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(2), 161-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9582-4
Antle, A. (2013). Research opportunities: Embodied child-computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer interaction 1(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2012.08.001
Balanskat, A., Blamire, R.y Kafal, S. (2007). The ICT impact report. A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet. http://portaldoprofessor.mec.gov.br/storage/materiais/0000012853.pdf
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency [BECTA]. (2004). A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/1603/1/becta_2004_barrierstouptake_litrev.pdf
Bossavit, B. y Pina, A. (2014). Designing educational tools, based on body interaction, for children with special needs who present different motor skills. En International Conference on Interactive Technologies and Games, iTAG 2014, 63–70. doi:10.1109/iTAG.2014.16
Booth, T. y Ainscow. M. (2011). Index for inclusion developing learning and participation in schools. CSIE.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E. y Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. Recuperado el 24 de noviembre de 2020 de https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf
Fugate, J. M. B., Macrine, S. L. y Cipriano, C. (2018). The role of embodied cognition for transforming learning. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7 (4), 274-288. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1443856
Fu, Y., Wu, J., Wu, S., Chai, H. y Xu, Y. (2015). Game system for rehabilitation based on Kinect is effective for mental retardation. En MATEC Web Conference, 22, 1036. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20152201036
Georgiou, Y. y Ioannou, A. (2019). Investigating in-service teachers’ concerns about adopting technology-enhanced embodied learning. En: Scheffel M., Broisin J., Pammer-Schindler V., Ioannou A., Schneider J. (eds) Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies. EC-TEL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11722. Springer.
Georgiou, Y. y Ioannou, A. (2020). A Co-design approach for the development and classroom integration of embodied learning Apps En International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. (217–229). Springer, Cham.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. y Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274.
Hall, G. E., George, A. A. y Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC questionnaire. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
Ioannou, M., Ioannou, A., Georgiou, Y. y Retalis, S. (2020). Designing and Orchestrating the Classroom Experience for Technology-Enhanced Embodied Learning. En Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The Interdisciplinarity of the Learning Sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 2 (pp. 1079-1086). Nashville,
Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Lawrence, J. E. y Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D.A. y Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819,
Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A. y Retalis, S. (2017). Using embodied learning technology to advance motor performance of children with special educational needs and motor impairments. En European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (111-124). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_
Kosmas, P. y Zaphiris, P. (2018). Embodied cognition and its implications in education: An overview of recent literature. Educational and pedagogical sciences, 12 (7), 970-976. DOI: 10.1999/1307-6892/10009334
Kyza, E. A. y Georgiou, Y. (2014). Developing in-service science teachers' ownership of the profiles pedagogical framework through a technology-supported participatory design approach to professional development. Science Education International 25, (2), 55-77. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1032967
Mademtzi, M. (2016). The use of a Kinect-based technology within the school environment to enhance sensory-motor skills of children with autism. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Birmingham.
Martínez-Monés, A., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Georgiou, Y., Ioannou, A., y Ruiz, M. J. (2019). The INTELed pedagogical framework: Applying embodied digital apps to support special education children in inclusive educational contexts. Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335595.3335652
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
Penuel, W. R. (2019). Co-design as infrastructuring with attention to power: Building collective capacity for equitable teaching and learning through design-based implementation research. En Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning (pp. 387-401). Springer, Cham.
Rozell, E.J. y Gardner, W.L. (1999). Computer-Related Success and Failure: A Longitudinal Field Study of the Factors Influencing Computer-Related Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(1), 1-10.
Vocht, M., Laherto A. y Parchmann, I. (2017). Exploring teachers’ concerns about bringing responsible research and innovation to European science classrooms. Journal of Sciences Teaching Education. 28, 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1343602
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review 9(4), 625-636
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
1. Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND), que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
2. Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as a publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales) antes y durante el proceso de revisión y publicación, ya que puede conducir a intercambios productivos y a una mayor y más rápida difusión del trabajo publicado (vea The Effect of Open Access).
