Professors’ Perceptions on the Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education: a case study in Brazil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.25.1.97

Keywords:

ChatGPT , Inservice Teacher Education, Higher Education, Professors’ Perceptions

Abstract

Since the emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), higher education professors worldwide have faced challenges related to academic integrity, ethics, cognitive bias, and the absence of clear regulation. Conversely, GAI holds significant potential to enhance educational experiences by increasing student engagement and enabling personalized learning. This study examines university professors’ perspectives on the use of ChatGPT as a teaching tool before, during, and after participating in a professional development workshop at a public university in Brazil. In August 2023, professors from diverse academic disciplines engaged in both individual and collaborative online synchronous and asynchronous activities over five days, including forum discussions, lectures, and self-reflection tasks. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the workshop’s organization, methodology, and instructional resources. Their primary motivations for attending were the desire to update their pedagogical practices and to exchange experiences with peers. Although participants demonstrated a general understanding of GAI, their familiarity with the technology varied: some had already used it, while others had not. Initially, their primary concern involved students’ use of GAI, however, they gradually recognized its potential to support their own teaching practices. After the workshop, participants reported feeling more confident about incorporating GAI into education and identified multiple possibilities for applying it within their disciplines. Overall, the findings highlight the transformative potential of faculty development initiatives to reshape professors’ attitudes toward GAI and ChatGPT, emphasizing the need for continuous professional learning and institutional support to promote the responsible and effective integration of these technologies in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Mughairi, H., & Bhaskar, P. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting the adoption AI techniques in higher education: insights from teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 18(2): 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2023-0129

Andrade, T. L. D., Almeira, C. M. M. D., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Rigo, S. J. (2023). Um modelo de sistema de recomendação integrado a metodologias ativas, MDE e learning analytics para a mitigação de evasão em EaD. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.2.185

Ausubel, D. P. (2003). Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: uma perspectiva cognitiva. 1. ed. Lisboa: Plátano Edições Técnicas.

Azevedo, S. B., Pacheco, V. A., & Santos, E. A. (2019). Metodologias ativas no ensino superior: percepção de docentes em uma instituição privada do Distrito Federal. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.35699/2237- 5864.2019.2573

Bonsu, E. M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: Determining students’ perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001

Farias, S. A. (2023). Pânico na Academia! Inteligência artificial na construção de textos científicos com o uso do ChatGPT. Revista Interdisciplinar de Marketing, 13(1), 79–8. https://doi.org/10.4025/rimar.v13i1.66865

Ferreira, D. M., Sudré, A. P., Rabello, C. R. L., Fernandes-Santos, C., Pereira, S. & Valente, L. C. M. (2021). Desenvolvimento Docente para o Ensino Remoto: Experiência do Programa de Inovação e Assessoria Curricular (PROIAC) da Universidade Federal Fluminense. EaD Em Foco, 11(2). https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1327

Guimarães, R. R., Malacarne, V., & Alves, F. L. (2024). CHATGPT, Metaverso, Web3 e outras tecnologias: desafios à educação do futuro. Debates em Educação, 16(38), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2024v16n38pe16114

Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benaderrahmane, S., Alhafni, B. & Rahwan, T. (2023). Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses. Scientific Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3

Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management & Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P., & Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.70725/815246mfssgp

Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT—A challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Education Sciences, 13(10), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101056

Lan, K.; Chung, F. & Chang, M. (2023). A pilot study of preservice teachers accepting and using chatbots to enhance CFL. In Yuch-Min Huang & Tânia Rocha (Eds). Innovative Technologies and Learning, Springer, pp. 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_25

Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2002). Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. SAGE Publications.

Meirinhos, M., & Osório, A. (2010). O estudo de caso como estratégia de investigação em educação. EduSer, 2(2), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v2i2.24 Miranda, L. S. K., & Andrade, A. P. (2023). Fazer docente, Chat GPT e usos possíveis: uma análise a partir da ética foucaultiana. SCIAS - Educação, Comunicação & Tecnologia, 5(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.36704/sciaseducomtec.v5i2.8110

Morgan D. L. (2025). Query-Based Analysis: A strategy for analyzing qualitative data using ChatGPT. Qualitative Health Research, 0(0), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251321712

Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(17), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Ogurlu, U., & Mossholder, J. (2023). The perception of ChatGPT among educators: preliminary findings. Research in Social Sciences & Technology, 8(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.39

Pimentel, M., & Carvalho, F. (2023a). ChatGPT: concepções epistêmico-didático- pedagógicas dos usos na educação. SBC Horizontes. https://horizontes.sbc.org.br/index.php/2023/06/chatgpt-concepcoes/

Pimentel, M., & Carvalho, F. (2023b). ChatGPT: potencialidades e riscos para a Educação. SBC Horizontes. https://horizontes.sbc.org.br/index.php/2023/05/chatgpt-potencialidades-e-riscos-para-a-educacao

Rodrigues, O. S., & Rodrigues, K. S. (2023). A inteligência artificial na educação: os desafios do Chat GPT. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 16, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.45997

Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146

Seabra, C. (2023). ChatGPT: nem monstro, nem tábua de salvação. Instituto Humanitas Unisinos. https://ihu.unisinos.br/publicacoes/78-noticias/626711-chatgpt-nem-monstro-nem-tabua-de-salvacao

Tracy, S. (2021). Calidad cualitativa: ocho pilares para una investigación cualitativa de calidad. Márgenes, Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga, 2 (2), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077800410383121

Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 23(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222408/

Valente, L. C. M., Ferreira, D. M., Pereira, S. & Barreto, C. M. B. (2021). Os desafios para a consolidação de um programa de desenvolvimento docente no ensino superior. En: Cassiano Caon Amorim; Ariane Norma de Menezes Sá (Org.). Experiências inovadoras em resposta aos desafios da educação superior no Brasil [recurso eletrônico]. 01ed (pp. 59-83). João Pessoa: Editora Universitária/UFPN.

Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students' perception of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(1), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150143

Vygotsky, L. S. (2008). Pensamento e Linguagem. São Paulo: Martins. Fontes.

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Professors’ Perceptions on the Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education: a case study in Brazil. (2026). Latin American Journal of Educational Technology - RELATEC, 25(1), 97-115. https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.25.1.97

Similar Articles

1-10 of 539

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.