Professors’ Perceptions on the Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education: a case study in Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.25.1.97Keywords:
ChatGPT , Inservice Teacher Education, Higher Education, Professors’ PerceptionsAbstract
Since the emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), higher education professors worldwide have faced challenges related to academic integrity, ethics, cognitive bias, and the absence of clear regulation. Conversely, GAI holds significant potential to enhance educational experiences by increasing student engagement and enabling personalized learning. This study examines university professors’ perspectives on the use of ChatGPT as a teaching tool before, during, and after participating in a professional development workshop at a public university in Brazil. In August 2023, professors from diverse academic disciplines engaged in both individual and collaborative online synchronous and asynchronous activities over five days, including forum discussions, lectures, and self-reflection tasks. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the workshop’s organization, methodology, and instructional resources. Their primary motivations for attending were the desire to update their pedagogical practices and to exchange experiences with peers. Although participants demonstrated a general understanding of GAI, their familiarity with the technology varied: some had already used it, while others had not. Initially, their primary concern involved students’ use of GAI, however, they gradually recognized its potential to support their own teaching practices. After the workshop, participants reported feeling more confident about incorporating GAI into education and identified multiple possibilities for applying it within their disciplines. Overall, the findings highlight the transformative potential of faculty development initiatives to reshape professors’ attitudes toward GAI and ChatGPT, emphasizing the need for continuous professional learning and institutional support to promote the responsible and effective integration of these technologies in higher education.
Downloads
References
Al-Mughairi, H., & Bhaskar, P. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting the adoption AI techniques in higher education: insights from teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 18(2): 232–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2023-0129
Andrade, T. L. D., Almeira, C. M. M. D., Barbosa, J. L. V., & Rigo, S. J. (2023). Um modelo de sistema de recomendação integrado a metodologias ativas, MDE e learning analytics para a mitigação de evasão em EaD. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.22.2.185
Ausubel, D. P. (2003). Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: uma perspectiva cognitiva. 1. ed. Lisboa: Plátano Edições Técnicas.
Azevedo, S. B., Pacheco, V. A., & Santos, E. A. (2019). Metodologias ativas no ensino superior: percepção de docentes em uma instituição privada do Distrito Federal. Revista Docência do Ensino Superior, 9, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.35699/2237- 5864.2019.2573
Bonsu, E. M., & Baffour-Koduah, D. (2023). From the consumers’ side: Determining students’ perception and intention to use ChatGPT in Ghanaian higher education. Journal of Education, Society & Multiculturalism, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2023-0001
Farias, S. A. (2023). Pânico na Academia! Inteligência artificial na construção de textos científicos com o uso do ChatGPT. Revista Interdisciplinar de Marketing, 13(1), 79–8. https://doi.org/10.4025/rimar.v13i1.66865
Ferreira, D. M., Sudré, A. P., Rabello, C. R. L., Fernandes-Santos, C., Pereira, S. & Valente, L. C. M. (2021). Desenvolvimento Docente para o Ensino Remoto: Experiência do Programa de Inovação e Assessoria Curricular (PROIAC) da Universidade Federal Fluminense. EaD Em Foco, 11(2). https://eademfoco.cecierj.edu.br/index.php/Revista/article/view/1327
Guimarães, R. R., Malacarne, V., & Alves, F. L. (2024). CHATGPT, Metaverso, Web3 e outras tecnologias: desafios à educação do futuro. Debates em Educação, 16(38), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.28998/2175-6600.2024v16n38pe16114
Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benaderrahmane, S., Alhafni, B. & Rahwan, T. (2023). Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses. Scientific Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38964-3
Iqbal, N., Ahmed, H., & Azhar, K. A. (2022). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT. Global Journal for Management & Administrative Sciences, 3(4), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.46568/gjmas.v3i4.163
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Grotewold, K., Hartwick, P., & Papin, K. (2023). Generative AI and teachers’ perspectives on its implementation in education. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 34(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.70725/815246mfssgp
Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT—A challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Education Sciences, 13(10), 313-338. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101056
Lan, K.; Chung, F. & Chang, M. (2023). A pilot study of preservice teachers accepting and using chatbots to enhance CFL. In Yuch-Min Huang & Tânia Rocha (Eds). Innovative Technologies and Learning, Springer, pp. 260-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40113-8_25
Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2002). Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. SAGE Publications.
Meirinhos, M., & Osório, A. (2010). O estudo de caso como estratégia de investigação em educação. EduSer, 2(2), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.34620/eduser.v2i2.24 Miranda, L. S. K., & Andrade, A. P. (2023). Fazer docente, Chat GPT e usos possíveis: uma análise a partir da ética foucaultiana. SCIAS - Educação, Comunicação & Tecnologia, 5(2), 142–157. https://doi.org/10.36704/sciaseducomtec.v5i2.8110
Morgan D. L. (2025). Query-Based Analysis: A strategy for analyzing qualitative data using ChatGPT. Qualitative Health Research, 0(0), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251321712
Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (Online), 18(17), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019
Ogurlu, U., & Mossholder, J. (2023). The perception of ChatGPT among educators: preliminary findings. Research in Social Sciences & Technology, 8(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.39
Pimentel, M., & Carvalho, F. (2023a). ChatGPT: concepções epistêmico-didático- pedagógicas dos usos na educação. SBC Horizontes. https://horizontes.sbc.org.br/index.php/2023/06/chatgpt-concepcoes/
Pimentel, M., & Carvalho, F. (2023b). ChatGPT: potencialidades e riscos para a Educação. SBC Horizontes. https://horizontes.sbc.org.br/index.php/2023/05/chatgpt-potencialidades-e-riscos-para-a-educacao
Rodrigues, O. S., & Rodrigues, K. S. (2023). A inteligência artificial na educação: os desafios do Chat GPT. Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, 16, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-3652.2023.45997
Sabzalieva, E., & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in higher education: Quick start guide. UNESCO, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385146
Seabra, C. (2023). ChatGPT: nem monstro, nem tábua de salvação. Instituto Humanitas Unisinos. https://ihu.unisinos.br/publicacoes/78-noticias/626711-chatgpt-nem-monstro-nem-tabua-de-salvacao
Tracy, S. (2021). Calidad cualitativa: ocho pilares para una investigación cualitativa de calidad. Márgenes, Revista de Educación de la Universidad de Málaga, 2 (2), 173-201. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077800410383121
Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, opportunities, and implications for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 23(1). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222408/
Valente, L. C. M., Ferreira, D. M., Pereira, S. & Barreto, C. M. B. (2021). Os desafios para a consolidação de um programa de desenvolvimento docente no ensino superior. En: Cassiano Caon Amorim; Ariane Norma de Menezes Sá (Org.). Experiências inovadoras em resposta aos desafios da educação superior no Brasil [recurso eletrônico]. 01ed (pp. 59-83). João Pessoa: Editora Universitária/UFPN.
Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students' perception of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(1), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150143
Vygotsky, L. S. (2008). Pensamento e Linguagem. São Paulo: Martins. Fontes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Caroline Fernandes-Santos, Silvia Pereira, Cintia Regina Lacerda Rabello

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).





