Repositories as public policy instruments for Open Educational Resources: the eduCAPES case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.24.2.105Keywords:
Open Educational Resources, Digital Repository, Higher Education, Public Policies, Distance EducationAbstract
Educational resource repositories have played a strategic role in digital education policies, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic and the expansion of hybrid and distance education. This article presents a multidimensional analysis of the eduCAPES portal, the main tool for promoting Open Educational Resources (OER) at the Open University of Brazil (UAB). Based on interviews, a questionnaire and documentary analysis, we constructed the trajectory of the portal and the challenges faced in its consolidation. The data point to the absence of a clear identity for eduCAPES, both conceptually as an «OER repository» and as part of a systematized public policy. The study also reveals conceptual, operational and institutional gaps, as well as conflicts among actors and disjointed actions. The analysis shows that, although important initiatives exist, they have not been articulated in a strategic and lasting way The study also reveals gaps related to the technical aspect. In analyzing the conceptual, technical and political elements, it highlights the importance of integrating repositories into a broader political project. It concludes that, to be successful, public OER repositories must, in addition to offering technical functionalities and optimizations, be anchored in actions that recognize “open” as a conceptual principle and promote the active engagement of the various stakeholders involved in the construction of a structuring policy.
Downloads
References
Amiel, T., Gonsales, P., & Sebriam, D. (2018). Recursos educacionais abertos no Brasil: 10 anos de ativismo. EmRede - Revista de Educação a Distância, 5(2), Artigo 2. https://doi.org/10.53628/emrede.v5i2.346
Birkland, T. A. (2019). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (5o ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351023948
BRASIL. (2006). Decreto no 5800. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2006/Decreto/D5800.htm
CAPES. ([s.d.]-a). Sistema UAB abrange 150 instituições de ensino superior. Recuperado 19 de janeiro de 2025, de https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/sistema-uab-abrange-150-instituicoes-de-ensino-superior
CAPES. (2023, setembro 20). Edital no 25/2023. CAPES. https://www.gov.br/capes/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/acoes-e-programas/educacao-a-distancia/editais-uab/edital-no-25-2023
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3a ed.). Sage.
Distância, A. | A. B. de E. a. ([s.d.]). Referatório de objetos de aprendizagem e outros recursos educacionais. ABED | Associação Brasileira de Educação a Distância. Recuperado 26 de junho de 2025, de https://www.abed.org.br/site/publicacoes/476/referatorio-de-objetos-de-aprendizagem-e-outros-recursos-educacionais
DOU. (2016a). PORTARIA CAPES No 106, DE 14 DE JULHO DE 2016. Semesp. https://www.semesp.org.br/legislacao/portaria-capes-no-106-de-14-de-julho-de-2016/
DOU. (2016b, outubro 21). Portaria No 183, de 21 de Outubro de 2016. https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/22061253/do1-2016-10-24-portaria-n-183-de-21-de-outubro-de-2016-22061195-22061195
eduCAPES. ([s.d.]-b). Sobre o portal eduCAPES. Recuperado 20 de junho de 2024, de https://educapes.capes.gov.br/redirect?action=about
Fengchum, M., Sanjaya, M., Dominic, O., & Janssen, B. (2021). Guidelines on the development of open educational resources policies. UNESCO Publishing.
IBICT. ([s.d.]). Sobre Repositórios Digitais—IBICT. Recuperado 26 de junho de 2025, de http://sitehistorico.ibict.br/informacao-para-ciencia-tecnologia-e-inovacao%20/repositorios-digitais
Inamorato, D. S. A., Punie, Y., & Castaño, M. J. (2016). Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher Education Institutions. JRC Publications Repository. https://doi.org/10.2791/293408
Kingdon, J. (2007). Como chega a hora de uma ideia? Em E. Saravia & E. Ferrarezi (Orgs.), Políticas públicas (Vol. 1, p. 219–224). ENAP.
Matland, R. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242
Mesquita, R. da C. de, & Amiel, T. (2023). Análise de Fatores que Afetam a Sustentabilidade de Repositórios de Recursos Educacionais Abertos. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, 35, Artigo 35. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.35.e8
Paragarino, V. R., Francolino, F. P., Barujel, A. G., & Nistal, M. L. (2016). A characterization of users of digital educational resources repositories the case of the Latin American Community of Learning Objects—LACLO. XI Latin American Conference on Learning Objects and Technology (LACLO), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/LACLO.2016.7751793
Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). Digital competencies for online teachers. Journal of Educators Online, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.3.13
Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA : Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. http://archive.org/details/advancedintroduc0000pete
Rossini, C., & Gonzales, C. (2012). REA: o debate em política pública e as oportunidades para o mercado. Em Recursos educacionais abertos: Práticas colaborativas e políticas públicas (p. 35–70). UFBA.
Rossini, C., Santana, B., Gonzalez, N. P., & Pretto, N. D. L. (2021). Recursos educacionais abertos: Práticas colaborativas e políticas públicas. Edufba.
Santos-Hermosa, G. (2023). The role of institutional repositories in higher education: Purpose and level of openness. Em D. Otto, G. Scharnberg, M. Kerres, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Orgs.), Distributed learning ecosystems: Concepts, resources, and repositories (p. 47–70). Springer Fachmedien. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38703-7_4
Sardinha, T. B. (2000). Anãlise Multidimensional. DELTA: Documentação e Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, 16(1). https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/delta/article/view/39990
Soares, T. C., & Amiel, T. (2017). Recursos educacionais na Universidade Aberta do Brasil: Perspectivas e práticas. https://zenodo.org/records/1065516
UNESCO. ([s.d.]). Gateways to public digital learning. Recuperado 25 de junho de 2025, de https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/learning-platforms-gateway
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Djaine Damiati, Tel Amiel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
1. The Author retains copyright in the article. Upon acceptance of the article, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the article. with the dcoument registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivative 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which allows to third parties to use what is published whenever they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this journal.
2. Authors can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided they clearly indicate that the work was published for the first time in this journal.
3. Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster diffusion of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
